International Business Machines Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | IBM peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
|
71 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
|
42 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.
|
38 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs The Sage Group plc
|
59 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs SAP SE
|
51 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs GoDaddy Inc.
|
69 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs NetApp, Inc.
|
71 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs F5, Inc.
|
65 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs Gartner, Inc.
|
61 | Compare → |
|
International Business Machines Corporation vs Dassault Systèmes SE
|
43 | Compare → |
View the complete International Business Machines Corporation report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.