Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | HWM peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Eaton Corporation plc
|
36 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Diploma PLC
|
47 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Crane Company
|
50 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Accelleron Industries AG
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs RATIONAL Aktiengesellschaft
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Cintas Corporation
|
63 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Trane Technologies plc
|
46 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
|
52 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Allegion plc
|
53 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Garmin Ltd.
|
47 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Woodward, Inc.
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs ITT Inc.
|
36 | Compare → |
View the complete Howmet Aerospace Inc. report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.