RENK holds the cleaner structural position, with growth as the main driver and valuation adding further support. In the market, Hensoldt carries the stronger setup — intact trend against RENK's broken trend. That leaves a split case: the structural lead stays with RENK, but the market is not currently confirming it.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Growth remains the main source of distance in the comparison. RENK Group AG leads by 14 points on the overall comparison score.
Both operate in: Aerospace & Defense
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. HAG.DE and R3NK.DE share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how Hensoldt and RENK each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
Score differences across key dimensions.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
The setup is mixed: neither company clearly combines the stronger profile with the more supportive price setup.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
The current lead is backed by a stronger multi-year growth trajectory.
Hensoldt AG still looks less cycle-sensitive — that keeps the result from looking completely one-sided.
Growth is the clearest driver, and valuation also supports RENK Group AG's broader structural position.
Break down the HAG.DE vs R3NK.DE comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how HAG.DE and R3NK.DE each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.