HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | HLE.DE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Hugo Boss AG
|
62 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Valeo SE
|
41 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Starbucks Corporation
|
40 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Knorr-Bremse AG
|
51 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs BorgWarner Inc.
|
33 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
|
63 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Aptiv PLC
|
24 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
53 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Tesla, Inc.
|
37 | Compare → |
|
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA vs Packaging Corporation of America
|
45 | Compare → |
View the complete HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.