Home Compare GFS
Peer Analysis

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare GFS with peers
Comparison GFS peer score
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs Infineon Technologies AG
36 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs Siltronic AG
15 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs Intel Corporation
26 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
26 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs Akamai Technologies, Inc.
34 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs Telecom Italia S.p.A.
41 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs EchoStar Corporation
21 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs Telefónica, S.A.
50 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs Hexagon AB (publ)
56 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs Texas Instruments Incorporated
62 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs P/F Bakkafrost
64 Compare →
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. vs BT Group plc
49 Compare →

Full GFS analysis in AssetNext

View the complete GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.