Home Compare GF.SW
Peer Analysis

Georg Fischer AG — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Georg Fischer AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare GF.SW with peers
Comparison GF.SW peer score
Georg Fischer AG vs Kemira Oyj
66 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Vallourec S.A.
68 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Drax Group plc
32 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Hera S.p.A.
50 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A.
71 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Evonik Industries AG
43 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs BASF SE
65 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Huber+Suhner AG
49 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation
78 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Kerry Group plc
47 Compare →
Georg Fischer AG vs Interpump Group S.p.A.
46 Compare →

Full GF.SW analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Georg Fischer AG report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.