Georg Fischer AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | GF.SW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Kemira Oyj
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A.
|
69 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs BASF SE
|
53 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation
|
72 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Evonik Industries AG
|
58 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Vallourec S.A.
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Huber+Suhner AG
|
44 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Kerry Group plc
|
47 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Johnson Matthey Plc
|
69 | Compare → |
|
Georg Fischer AG vs Drax Group plc
|
27 | Compare → |
View the complete Georg Fischer AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.