Genuine Parts Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | GPC peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Genuine Parts Company vs Aptiv PLC
|
24 | Compare → |
|
Genuine Parts Company vs Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Genuine Parts Company vs Marks and Spencer Group plc
|
30 | Compare → |
|
Genuine Parts Company vs BorgWarner Inc.
|
33 | Compare → |
|
Genuine Parts Company vs Knorr-Bremse AG
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Genuine Parts Company vs The Home Depot, Inc.
|
49 | Compare → |
View the complete Genuine Parts Company report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.