Fresnillo plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | FRES.L peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Fresnillo plc vs Antofagasta plc
|
64 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Micron Technology, Inc.
|
77 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs AngloGold Ashanti plc
|
86 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Swisscom AG
|
59 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Coterra Energy Inc.
|
71 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Lonza Group AG
|
35 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Italgas S.p.A.
|
47 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Texas Instruments Incorporated
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs EQT Corporation
|
67 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Meta Platforms, Inc.
|
70 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Vår Energi ASA
|
82 | Compare → |
|
Fresnillo plc vs Royal Gold, Inc.
|
58 | Compare → |
View the complete Fresnillo plc report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.