Home Compare XOM
Peer Analysis

ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare XOM with peers
Comparison XOM peer score
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Chevron Corporation
39 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Shell plc
68 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Repsol, S.A.
65 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs TotalEnergies SE
76 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs BP p.l.c.
71 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A.
71 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
53 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Neste Oyj
31 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Eni S.p.A.
50 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs HF Sinclair Corporation
63 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Marathon Petroleum Corporation
71 Compare →
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation vs Valero Energy Corporation
57 Compare →

Full XOM analysis in AssetNext

View the complete ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.