Evonik Industries AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | EVK.DE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Evonik Industries AG vs Arkema S.A.
|
20 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs Brenntag SE
|
34 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs Johnson Matthey Plc
|
71 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
|
52 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs BASF SE
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs Kemira Oyj
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs Dow Inc.
|
45 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs ArcelorMittal S.A.
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Evonik Industries AG vs UPM-Kymmene Oyj
|
64 | Compare → |
View the complete Evonik Industries AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.