Eaton Corporation plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | ETN peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs ITT Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Crane Company
|
35 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Trane Technologies plc
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Diploma PLC
|
38 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
|
63 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Allegion plc
|
60 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Schneider Electric S.E.
|
35 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Cintas Corporation
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Rotork plc
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Hubbell Incorporated
|
54 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs IMI plc
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Eaton Corporation plc vs Halma plc
|
50 | Compare → |
View the complete Eaton Corporation plc report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.