Pentair holds the cleaner structural position, with profitability as the main driver and valuation adding further support. The remaining gap is narrow enough that the comparison remains open to different readings. The market setup is currently leaning toward Dover, which does not confirm the structural lead. That leaves a split case: the structural lead stays with Pentair, but the market is not currently confirming it.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Profitability remains the main source of distance in the comparison. The overall score gap is 8 points in favour of Pentair plc.
Both operate in: Specialty Industrial Machinery
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. DOV and PNR share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how Dover and Pentair each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
The two profiles are relatively close, but the price setup still leans toward Pentair plc.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
The profitability gap is wide, with the stronger side earning materially better operating marks.
The market setup is mixed for both, so the structural comparison carries most of the weight here.
Profitability is the clearest driver, and valuation also supports Pentair plc's broader structural position.
Break down the DOV vs PNR comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how DOV and PNR each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.