Home Compare DELL vs HPQ
Stock Comparison · Industry comparison · Computer Hardware

Dell Technologies vs HP: Which Stock Looks Stronger in 2026?

The structural profiles are close, with HP carrying a narrow edge on growth. Dell Technologies still has the edge on growth, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. In the market, Dell Technologies carries the stronger setup — intact trend against HP's broken trend. That leaves a split case: the structural lead stays with HP, but the market is not currently confirming it.

The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels. Both peer scores are relative to the S&P 500 universe, making them directly comparable.

Updated 2026-07-05

The page question resolves through growth, where Dell Technologies Inc. holds the stronger read even though the broader score still favours HP Inc..

INDUSTRY COMPARISON

Both operate in: Computer Hardware

This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. DELL and HPQ share the same industry classification.

For a similarity-based comparison, see how Dell Technologies and HP each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.

Peer-Relative Score
DELL
Dell Technologies Inc.
68
Peer-Score
Signal qualitylow
Peer basis: S&P 500
vs
HPQ
HP Inc.
70
Peer-Score
Signal qualitylow
Peer basis: S&P 500

Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.

The clearest separation appears in growth.

Dimension spread: DELL vs HPQ Profitability 84 85 Stability 35 47 Valuation 57 88 Growth 93 42 DELL HPQ
Gap Ranking
#1 Growth +51
#2 Valuation +31
#3 Stability +12
#4 Profitability +1
Price Setup

Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.

Price setup map for DELL and HPQ Stronger + cheaper Stronger + richer Weaker + cheaper Weaker + richer DELLHPQ Relative valuation Structural strength

The setup splits cleanly: structure favours Dell Technologies Inc., while the price setup favours HP Inc..

Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.

Entry today — historical context

Where DELL and HPQ each sit in their own 5-year price and valuation history.

BASED ON 5-YEAR HISTORY DELL Elevated · above norm 0th 50th 100th 88 pct gap HPQ Lower · near norm 0th 50th 100th 98th 10th
Today HPQ sits in the lower portion of its own 5-year history (10th percentile), while DELL sits higher in its own history (98th). Within each stock's own 5-year context, HPQ is at a historically more favourable entry position than DELL. This reflects entry timing, not which company is structurally stronger — peer-relative analysis is a separate question addressed above.

Describes historical entry positioning only. Descriptive — not investment advice.

Relative Position vs Comparable Companies
Growth
Both rank well on growth, but Dell Technologies Inc. still holds a clear edge.
Valuation
On valuation, the edge is clear — both rank well, but HP Inc. sits noticeably higher.
Growth — Dominant Gap
DELL
93
HPQ
42
Gap+51in favour of DELL

The clearest distance comes from a stronger growth profile.

What keeps the gap from being one-sided

On the market side, Dell Technologies carries the stronger trend while HP's trend has broken — the market setup does not confirm the structural advantage.

What this means for the comparison

Growth is the clearest driver of the lead, with valuation adding further support — though growth still provides a real counterweight.

Explore full peer positioning in AssetNext

Break down the DELL vs HPQ comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Explore full breakdown →
Other comparisons with conflicting dimension signals

Explore how DELL and HPQ each compare against other companies in their peer groups.

Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.