Curtiss-Wright Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | CW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Eaton Corporation plc
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Diploma PLC
|
38 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs General Dynamics Corporation
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs ITT Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
|
41 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Halma plc
|
50 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Trane Technologies plc
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs StandardAero, Inc.
|
36 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Legrand SA
|
31 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Allegion plc
|
60 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Woodward, Inc.
|
64 | Compare → |
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs Thales S.A.
|
65 | Compare → |
View the complete Curtiss-Wright Corporation report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.