CTS Eventim KGaA holds the cleaner structural position, with the lead spread across growth and profitability. Fox still leads on valuation and stability, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. Both sides have seen trend damage — neither carries a clear market edge right now. With both trends damaged, the structural comparison carries most of the weight here.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Most of the lead runs through growth, while profitability helps make the separation broader. The overall score gap is 12 points in favour of CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA.
Both operate in: Entertainment
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. EVD.DE and FOX share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how CTS Eventim KGaA and Fox each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
Score differences across key dimensions.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA still looks stronger overall, though current pricing looks more supportive for Fox Corporation.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
Earnings growth is one contributing factor within the growth lead.
Fox Corporation still shows lower market-fundamental divergence, which keeps the wider picture mixed rather than completely one-sided.
The lead is built on both growth and profitability — though valuation still provides a counterweight.
Break down the EVD.DE vs FOX comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how EVD.DE and FOX each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.