Home Compare CRDA.L
Peer Analysis

Croda International Plc — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Croda International Plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare CRDA.L with peers
Comparison CRDA.L peer score
Croda International Plc vs Wacker Chemie AG
30 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs Arkema S.A.
20 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs Mondi plc
49 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs Syensqo SA/NV
38 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs BASF SE
61 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs UPM-Kymmene Oyj
64 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs Stora Enso Oyj
65 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
52 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs Endesa, S.A.
73 Compare →
Croda International Plc vs Eni S.p.A.
54 Compare →

Full CRDA.L analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Croda International Plc report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.