CRH plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | CRH peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
CRH plc vs The Sherwin-Williams Company
|
72 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs Heidelberg Materials AG
|
71 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs RPM International Inc.
|
63 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs Ecolab Inc.
|
66 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs PPG Industries, Inc.
|
66 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs Symrise AG
|
25 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs Givaudan SA
|
59 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
|
60 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs Norsk Hydro ASA
|
53 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs ATI Inc.
|
26 | Compare → |
|
CRH plc vs PepsiCo, Inc.
|
70 | Compare → |
View the complete CRH plc report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.