Crane Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | CR peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Crane Company vs Eaton Corporation plc
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs Wärtsilä Oyj Abp
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs Flowserve Corporation
|
46 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs ITT Inc.
|
51 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs Hubbell Incorporated
|
54 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs Trane Technologies plc
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs Allegion plc
|
60 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs ABB Ltd
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs Sulzer AG
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs Diploma PLC
|
38 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs IMI plc
|
62 | Compare → |
|
Crane Company vs Rotork plc
|
56 | Compare → |
View the complete Crane Company report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.