Compass Group PLC's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | CPG.L peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Compass Group PLC vs TUI AG
|
65 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs Coupang, Inc.
|
20 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs SharkNinja, Inc.
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs Chewy, Inc.
|
31 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
|
45 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
|
63 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs AUTO1 Group SE
|
44 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs Zalando SE
|
50 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs Marks and Spencer Group plc
|
30 | Compare → |
|
Compass Group PLC vs Aptiv PLC
|
24 | Compare → |
View the complete Compass Group PLC report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.