Home Compare CCH.L
Peer Analysis

Coca-Cola HBC AG — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Coca-Cola HBC AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare CCH.L with peers
Comparison CCH.L peer score
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
65 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs PepsiCo, Inc.
70 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs Walmart Inc.
54 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs Costco Wholesale Corporation
67 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.
55 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs Cranswick plc
59 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs Royal Unibrew A/S
57 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs US Foods Holding Corp.
40 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs Jerónimo Martins, SGPS, S.A.
49 Compare →
Coca-Cola HBC AG vs Performance Food Group Company
29 Compare →

Full CCH.L analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Coca-Cola HBC AG report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.