Home Compare CNA
Peer Analysis

CNA Financial Corporation — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

CNA Financial Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare CNA with peers
Comparison CNA peer score
CNA Financial Corporation vs Loews Corporation
51 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
61 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs Chubb Limited
71 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
61 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs MetLife, Inc.
46 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs Raymond James Financial, Inc.
75 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs AXA SA
51 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs American Financial Group, Inc.
56 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs Tritax Big Box Ord
49 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs Unum Group
48 Compare →
CNA Financial Corporation vs St. James's Place plc
59 Compare →

Full CNA analysis in AssetNext

View the complete CNA Financial Corporation report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.