Home Compare CHRW
Peer Analysis

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare CHRW with peers
Comparison CHRW peer score
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs Kuehne + Nagel International AG
33 Compare →
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs Deutsche Post AG
48 Compare →
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs United Parcel Service, Inc.
68 Compare →
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
62 Compare →
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs Generac Holdings Inc.
15 Compare →
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs FedEx Corporation
58 Compare →
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs Randstad N.V.
49 Compare →

Full CHRW analysis in AssetNext

View the complete C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.