The structural profiles are close, with Camden Property Trust carrying a narrow edge on growth. Vodafone Public Company still leads on growth and valuation, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. In the market, Vodafone Public Company carries the stronger setup — intact trend against Camden Property Trust's broken trend. That leaves a split case: the structural lead stays with Camden Property Trust, but the market is not currently confirming it.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels. Peer scores are normalised within each company's primary universe (CPT: S&P 500, VOD.L: STOXX 600).
The page question resolves through growth, where Vodafone Group Public Limited Company holds the stronger read even though the broader score still favours Camden Property Trust.
This comparison is anchored in long-term financial trajectory similarity within the selected peer universe.
A solid similarity means the pair shares a clearly comparable long-term financial profile, even if individual dimensions still differ.
The match is driven mainly by recent revenue growth and margin consistency.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
The structural gap is limited here, but current pricing still leans against Camden Property Trust.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) and Forward P/E where available.
Where CPT and VOD.L each sit in their own 5-year price and valuation history.
Describes historical entry positioning only. Descriptive — not investment advice.
The current lead is backed by a stronger multi-year growth trajectory.
Absolute pricing still looks more supportive for Vodafone Public Company, with a forward P/E that is 71 turns lower there.
Growth is the clearest driver of the lead, with profitability adding further support — though growth still provides a real counterweight.
Break down the CPT vs VOD.L comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how CPT and VOD.L each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.