BKW AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | BKW.SW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
BKW AG vs Fortum Oyj
|
45 | Compare → |
|
BKW AG vs Eni S.p.A.
|
40 | Compare → |
|
BKW AG vs Kering SA
|
29 | Compare → |
|
BKW AG vs UPM-Kymmene Oyj
|
46 | Compare → |
|
BKW AG vs Endesa, S.A.
|
52 | Compare → |
|
BKW AG vs Engie SA
|
56 | Compare → |
|
BKW AG vs ON Semiconductor Corporation
|
22 | Compare → |
|
BKW AG vs CNH Industrial N.V.
|
27 | Compare → |
|
BKW AG vs Croda International Plc
|
27 | Compare → |
View the complete BKW AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.