Home Compare BRK-B
Peer Analysis

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare BRK-B with peers
Comparison BRK-B peer score
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs ASR Nederland N.V.
60 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs Coinbase Global, Inc.
25 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs Apollo Global Management, Inc.
45 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs Wynn Resorts, Limited
39 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
67 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs Cincinnati Financial Corporation
59 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs Las Vegas Sands Corp.
69 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs Getlink SE
53 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs Carnival Corporation Ltd.
62 Compare →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. vs CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA
60 Compare →

Full BRK-B analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Berkshire Hathaway Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.