Home Compare BAC vs BBVA.MC
Stock Comparison · Industry comparison · Banks - Diversified

Bank of America vs Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria: Which Stock Looks Stronger in 2026?

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, holds the cleaner structural position, with the lead spread across profitability and growth. Bank of America still has the edge on stability, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. On the market side, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, is in better shape — its trend is intact while Bank of America's trend has broken down. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria,'s lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.

The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels. Peer scores are normalised within each company's primary universe (BAC: S&P 500, BBVA.MC: STOXX 600).

Updated 2026-05-17

Most of the lead runs through profitability, while growth helps make the separation broader. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. leads by 18 points on the overall comparison score.

INDUSTRY COMPARISON

Both operate in: Banks - Diversified

This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. BAC and BBVA.MC share the same industry classification.

For a similarity-based comparison, see how Bank of America and BBVA.MC each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.

Peer-Relative Score
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
51
Peer-Score
Signal qualitylow
Peer basis: S&P 500
vs
BBVA.MC
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
69
Peer-Score
Signal qualityMedium
Peer basis: STOXX 600

Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.

Score differences across key dimensions.

Dimension spread: BAC vs BBVA.MC Profitability 24 75 Stability 52 42 Valuation 80 80 Growth 45 72 BAC BBVA.MC
Gap Ranking
#1 Profitability +51
#2 Growth +27
#3 Stability +10
#4 Valuation
Price Setup

Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.

Price setup map for BAC and BBVA.MC Stronger + cheaper Stronger + richer Weaker + cheaper Weaker + richer BACBBVA.MC Relative valuation Structural strength

Neither company combines the stronger profile with the cheaper valuation.

Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.

Entry today — historical context

Where BAC and BBVA.MC each sit in their own 5-year price and valuation history.

BASED ON 5-YEAR HISTORY BAC Elevated · above norm 0th 50th 100th 6 pct gap BBVA.MC Elevated · above norm 0th 50th 100th 89th 95th
BAC (89th percentile) and BBVA.MC (95th percentile) both sit in the upper portion of their own 5-year ranges. The historical entry context is broadly similar for both. This reflects entry timing, not which company is structurally stronger.

Describes historical entry positioning only. Descriptive — not investment advice.

Relative Position vs Comparable Companies
Profitability
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. ranks near the top of the group on profitability; Bank of America Corporation sits in the weaker half.
Growth
On growth, the same pattern holds: both are strong, but Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. still leads clearly.
Profitability — Dominant Gap
BAC
24
BBVA.MC
75
Gap+51in favour of BBVA.MC

The profitability lead is mainly driven by a 18.9-point operating margin advantage.

What keeps the gap from being one-sided

Bank of America Corporation still shows lower market-fundamental divergence, which keeps the wider picture mixed rather than completely one-sided.

What this means for the comparison

The lead is built on both profitability and growth — though stability still provides a counterweight.

Explore full peer positioning in AssetNext

Break down the BAC vs BBVA.MC comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Explore full breakdown →
Similar profitability-driven comparisons

Explore how BAC and BBVA.MC each compare against other companies in their peer groups.

Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.