Aroundtown holds the cleaner structural position, with the lead spread across profitability and growth. Deutsche Wohnen SE still has the edge on stability, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. Both sides have seen trend damage — neither carries a clear market edge right now. With both trends damaged, the structural comparison carries most of the weight here.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Most of the lead runs through profitability, while growth helps make the separation broader. Aroundtown SA leads by 26 points on the overall comparison score.
Both operate in: Real Estate Services
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. AT1.DE and DWNI.DE share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how Aroundtown and Deutsche Wohnen SE each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
Score differences across key dimensions.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
The setup stays mixed because structure and the price setup do not align cleanly in one direction.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) and Forward P/E where available.
The profitability lead is mainly driven by a 18.9-point operating margin advantage.
Deutsche Wohnen SE still shows lower market-fundamental divergence, which keeps the wider picture mixed rather than completely one-sided.
The lead is built on both profitability and growth — though stability still provides a counterweight.
Break down the AT1.DE vs DWNI.DE comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how AT1.DE and DWNI.DE each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.