Dow leads structurally, with valuation as the clearest single gap between the two profiles. On the market side, Dow is in better shape — its trend is intact while Arkema's trend has broken down. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — Dow's lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Valuation still does most of the heavy lifting in this comparison. Dow Inc. leads by 9 points on the overall comparison score.
This pair is matched through long-term financial trajectory similarity within the selected peer universe.
This level of similarity signals a strong structural match, even though some dimensions still separate the two companies.
The clearest structural overlap shows up in margin trend and recent revenue growth.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
Pricing shapes this comparison more than a broad operating gap.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
The structural gap is limited here, but current pricing still leans against Arkema S.A..
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) and Forward P/E where available.
The peer-relative valuation gap is very wide, with the stronger side also looking meaningfully cheaper.
Arkema S.A. still shows lower market-fundamental divergence, which keeps the wider picture mixed rather than completely one-sided.
Valuation clearly separates the pair, while the broader read stays strong rather than one-way.
Break down the AKE.PA vs DOW comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how AKE.PA and DOW each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.