The structural profiles are close, with Applied Industrial Technologies carrying a narrow edge on profitability. Grafton still has the edge on valuation, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. The market setup broadly confirms the structural lead — Applied Industrial Technologies holds the more constructive position. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — Applied Industrial Technologies's lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
This is not just a one-metric split: both profitability and stability materially support the lead.
Both operate in: Industrial Distribution
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. AIT and GFTU.L share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how AIT and Grafton each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. still looks stronger overall, though current pricing looks more supportive for Grafton Group plc.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
Capital efficiency adds support, with a 11.3-point ROIC advantage.
Absolute pricing still looks more supportive for Grafton, with a forward P/E that is 12.3 turns lower there.
The lead is built on both profitability and valuation — though valuation still provides a counterweight.
Break down the AIT vs GFTU.L comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how AIT and GFTU.L each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.