APi Group Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | APG peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
APi Group Corporation vs Bilfinger SE
|
51 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft
|
50 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs Babcock International Group PLC
|
65 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs Balfour Beatty plc
|
80 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs Jacobs Solutions Inc.
|
40 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs MasTec, Inc.
|
44 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs SPIE SA
|
35 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs EMCOR Group, Inc.
|
74 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs Mitie Group plc
|
48 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs WESCO International, Inc.
|
47 | Compare → |
|
APi Group Corporation vs ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A.
|
59 | Compare → |
View the complete APi Group Corporation report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.