Home Compare AM
Peer Analysis

Antero Midstream Corporation — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Antero Midstream Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare AM with peers
Comparison AM peer score
Antero Midstream Corporation vs The Williams Companies, Inc.
61 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs DT Midstream, Inc.
63 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs Simon Property Group, Inc.
75 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane S.p.A.
45 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs PSP Swiss Property AG
63 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs Aena S.M.E., S.A.
58 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation
58 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs Gecina
50 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs American Tower Corporation
58 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs Public Storage
62 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs Norfolk Southern Corporation
47 Compare →
Antero Midstream Corporation vs Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield SE
66 Compare →

Full AM analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Antero Midstream Corporation report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.