Allfunds Group plc's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | ALLFG.AS peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Allfunds Group plc vs VEND.OL
|
49 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs Adyen N.V.
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs ageas SA/NV
|
47 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs Crown Castle Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs Kinder Morgan, Inc.
|
60 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
|
38 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs Banca Mediolanum S.p.A.
|
63 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs Pfizer Inc.
|
42 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs KBC Ancora SA
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs Cheniere Energy, Inc.
|
88 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs Poste Italiane S.p.A.
|
49 | Compare → |
|
Allfunds Group plc vs Azimut Holding S.p.A.
|
65 | Compare → |
View the complete Allfunds Group plc report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.