Home Compare ACS.MC
Peer Analysis

ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare ACS.MC with peers
Comparison ACS.MC peer score
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs Quanta Services, Inc.
29 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs MasTec, Inc.
44 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft
50 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs EMCOR Group, Inc.
74 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs StandardAero, Inc.
36 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs APi Group Corporation
50 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs Krones AG
68 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs Bilfinger SE
51 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs SPIE SA
35 Compare →
ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. vs Mitie Group plc
48 Compare →

Full ACS.MC analysis in AssetNext

View the complete ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.