Zillow Group, Inc. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong growth and profitability, but very weak valuation and stability. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Zillow Group operates an online real estate marketplace, offering property listings and related digital services.
The market prices Zillow Group on ambitious growth with persistent margin weakness, not on sustainable capital returns. With an operating margin of just 3.2% and a ROIC at 1.5%—both below sector averages and insufficient to cover the cost of capital—the company is valued as a growth investment with elevated risk rather than a stable asset. In the PropTech sector, sustainable profitability is key to rerating, but Zillow’s margins and capital returns lag despite its innovation edge, so the market prices each earnings report into the stock with heightened sensitivity to future improvement rather than current fundamentals. As long as profitability remains low, revenue growth alone will not change the valuation. Only a clear and sustained lift in operating margin to peer levels over at least two quarters would break the current valuation framing.
Break down ZG's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.