Wihlborgs Fastigheter AB (publ) ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with growth as the least supportive dimension. Trend conditions have deteriorated, without yet reaching an extreme downside state. Price behavior is partially reflecting the structural picture, with a moderate gap remaining.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Wihlborgs Fastigheter AB is a Swedish commercial real estate company focused on property management and development.
The market prices Wihlborgs Fastigheter as a real estate company with ongoing erosion in capital returns and stability, not as a defensive quality asset. With ROIC at just 2.8% (trailing the sector median over FY22–FY23) and a stability score of 9/100 (reflecting high volatility in recent periods), the market penalizes the company’s weak capital efficiency and pronounced volatility by assigning a risk premium, reflecting a view that the business model warrants a valuation discount versus more stable peers. Compared to other Swedish commercial real estate firms, the market further widens Wihlborgs’ peer-relative gap by factoring in heightened sensitivity to regional economic and interest rate risks, which amplifies the perceived risk profile in its valuation. The market assigns no premium for growth or quality here, and only a sustained improvement in capital returns above 5% together with a clear stabilization of volatility over at least two quarters could change this assessment.
Break down WIHL.ST's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.