Home Companies SHW
Basic Materials · Specialty Chemicals · Peer Analysis

The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) — Structural Peer Analysis

The Sherwin-Williams Company ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with a broadly solid profile across the main structural dimensions. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. The market is broadly confirming the structural profile.

Updated 2026-04-05 · SP500
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Valuation 56
Above median
Weak Growth 70
Top 25% of peers
Moderate Profitability 81
Top 10% of peers
Strongest Stability 82
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
72
Peer-Score
Above-average peer position
Signal qualityMedium

Explore how SHW compares across its peer group

Break down SHW's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare SHW with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.