Tesla, Inc. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with strong growth offset by very weak valuation. The trend setup is mixed, though short-term momentum remains constructive. Price behavior is partially reflecting the structural picture, with a moderate gap remaining.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Tesla designs and manufactures electric vehicles, energy solutions, and AI-driven robotics. The company is known for rapid innovation and ambitious growth targets.
The market prices Tesla on growth narrative and innovation potential, not on sustainable capital returns or stable margins. With a ROIC of 4.1% (trails sector median for FY25) and a stability score of 8/100 (high volatility in earnings and execution), the market assigns a premium to Tesla’s strong revenue growth that amplifies sensitivity to risk and uncertainty—rewarding upside potential but penalizing any sign of instability more sharply than it would for a quality compounder. Unlike traditional automakers, Tesla focuses on AI and robotics, but the market requires tangible, repeatable results before reconsidering its valuation. Only if Tesla delivers stable margins and peer-level capital returns across multiple quarters will the market’s valuation logic shift.
Break down TSLA's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.