Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with strong growth and valuation offset by weak profitability. The market setup is mixed, without a clear directional signal. Recent price action is broadly in line with the structural positioning.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Take-Two Interactive develops and publishes video games and interactive entertainment software. The company is known for major franchises and a focus on in-game monetization.
TTWO trades as a growth bet, not a quality leader. With operating margin at just 6.7%—well below the industry median—the market prices in revenue growth from blockbuster titles and recurring in-game spending despite low profitability and efficiency. Because every positive growth update leads to re-rating, valuation reacts strongly to growth potential, with the market quick to adjust prices even for minor disappointments. The stock’s 41.8% one-year volatility shows that valuation is quick to react to growth headlines rather than margin trends. A single missed growth quarter triggers sharp repricing.
Break down TTWO's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.