Southern Copper Corporation ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with growth as the main structural strength. Price action is not yet fully confirming the underlying structural profile.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Southern Copper Corporation is an integrated copper producer with major operations in Peru and Mexico.
SCCO trades as a leveraged copper-cycle play. With a 44.2% operating margin, the business delivers top-tier profitability, but the market interprets every copper price move as a direct earnings lever—resulting in 41.8% one-year volatility. SCCO is more geographically and product-concentrated than other mining peers, which increases the sensitivity of its share price to copper price swings. The market assigns SCCO mixed valuation levels: a premium for copper-cycle upside is offset by a penalty for volatility. A sharp copper price drop or political shock in Peru or Mexico can trigger immediate repricing.
Break down SCCO's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.