Home Companies STX
Technology · Computer Hardware · Peer Analysis

Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) — Structural Peer Analysis

Seagate Technology Holdings plc ranks near the peer group median, with valuation as the least supportive dimension. Price action is modestly ahead of the structural profile — a mild divergence, not yet a decisive signal.

Updated 2026-07-26 · NASDAQ100
Current market signal · 2026-07-24
Quality under pressure

Premium on AI Cycle, Volatility Unforgiven

52w drawdown -22.1% · 21d vs sector -16.2%

View STX situation → All companies with this signal
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zoneabove norm
TODAY (5y history)99th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range and its multiple is above its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Valuation 28
Below median
Weak Stability 57
Above median
Moderate Growth 67
Top 25% of peers
Strongest Profitability 68
Top 25% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
54
Peer-Score
Mid-range peer position
Signal qualityMedium
Structural Read

Premium on AI Cycle, Volatility Unforgiven

Seagate Technology Holdings designs and manufactures data storage solutions, with a focus on hard disk drives and advanced storage technologies.

STX is priced as a supercycle beneficiary with an AI narrative. 1Y volatility stands at 46.2% (top decile, high sensitivity to cycle shifts), so the market reacts to even modest demand signals with outsized price swings, interpreting each quarter as a cycle signal. STX’s focus on high-end HAMR drives amplifies its leverage to AI-driven demand, making narrative shifts more impactful here than for traditional storage peers. Operating margin is 15.7% (well above peer median, resilient under cost pressure). The market values STX as a structural winner rather than a cyclical storage stock. A break in the AI supercycle narrative would trigger abrupt premium compression.

AssetNext · 2026-06-25 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how STX compares across its peer group

Break down STX's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare STX with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.