Home Companies STX
Technology · Computer Hardware · Peer Analysis

Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) — Structural Peer Analysis

Seagate Technology Holdings plc ranks near the peer group median, with valuation as the least supportive dimension. Price action is modestly ahead of the structural profile — a mild divergence, not yet a decisive signal.

Updated 2026-06-14 · NASDAQ100
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zoneabove norm
TODAY (5y history)99th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range and its multiple is above its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Valuation 30
Below median
Weak Stability 64
Above median
Moderate Growth 67
Top 25% of peers
Strongest Profitability 71
Top 25% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
57
Peer-Score
Above-average peer position
Signal qualityMedium
Structural Read

Premium on AI Storage, Fragile on Cycles

Seagate Technology Holdings plc designs and manufactures data storage solutions, focusing on hard disk drives and cloud infrastructure.

STX is priced as a direct beneficiary of the AI storage boom. With a sector-leading operating margin of 22.5%, the business delivers efficiency that supports a premium valuation. The market prices STX with a tight focus on storage demand cycles, reacting to any perceived slowdown with sharp price swings—1Y volatility at 48.7% places STX among the most cyclical stocks. Because STX is nearly fully booked through build-to-order cloud contracts, even minor shifts in demand are interpreted as indicators for the storage supercycle, amplifying every quarterly move. STX’s nearline capacity and Mozaic 4+ platform connect it closely to AI cloud storage, making the company a focused player in this segment. A break in the AI storage trend or a weak quarter can trigger a sharp rerating.

AssetNext · 2026-05-04 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how STX compares across its peer group

Break down STX's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare STX with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.