Home Companies RDC.DE
Healthcare · Pharmaceutical Retailers · Peer Analysis

Redcare Pharmacy NV (RDC.DE) — Structural Peer Analysis

Redcare Pharmacy NV ranks among the weaker positions in its peer group, with a split structural profile: strong growth, but weak profitability and valuation. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price action is lagging the structural profile — current market behavior is not yet confirming the structural position.

Updated 2026-06-14 · HDAX
ENTRY TODAY
Lower price zonebelow norm
TODAY (5y history)11th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically lower range and its multiple is below its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Profitability 5
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Valuation 16
Bottom 25% of peers
Moderate Stability 31
Below median
Strongest Growth 61
Above median
Peer-Relative Score
25
Peer-Score
Below-average peer position
Signal qualitylow
Structural Read

Premium Hinges on Growth, Not Quality

Redcare Pharmacy NV is a pharmaceutical retailer operating in Germany, specializing in online pharmacy services.

Redcare Pharmacy is priced as a growth bet, not a quality stock. With revenue growth at 18%—sector-leading momentum—and an operating margin of just 2.5%, the market sets valuation primarily on acceleration and momentum, actively prioritizing top-line expansion over the company’s low profitability. Redcare Pharmacy combines its online pharmacy focus with regulatory tailwinds from e-prescriptions, reinforcing this dynamic: the business expands but does not generate strong earnings. The market’s valuation reflects a preference for short-term growth over earnings stability, so each new growth number directly shifts sentiment. A single quarter of slowed revenue growth is enough to trigger a sharp rerating.

AssetNext · 2026-05-13 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how RDC.DE compares across its peer group

Break down RDC.DE's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare RDC.DE with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.