QXO, Inc. ranks near the peer group median, with strong growth and valuation offset by weak profitability. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price action is lagging the structural profile — current market behavior is not yet confirming the structural position.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
No verifiable information is available on QXO, Inc. as of the latest update.
The market prices QXO on continued margin and capital efficiency deterioration, not on a peer-level recovery. With ROIC at just 2.1%—over 400bps below the peer median—and operating margin down to 1.8% after a 1.2pp year-on-year drop, the market interprets these numbers as ongoing weakness rather than a cyclical dip. In a sector where margins are always tight, QXO stands out for the speed of its operational erosion, which prevents a rerating. As a result, the market assigns QXO a persistent valuation discount versus peers and reacts to its underperformance by stripping away any premium typically awarded for growth or stability. Only a clear turnaround in both margins and capital returns sustained for at least two quarters would change the market's view.
Break down QXO's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.