Home Companies OC
Industrials · Building Products & Equipment · Peer Analysis

Owens Corning (OC) — Structural Peer Analysis

Owens Corning ranks below the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong valuation, but weak growth and profitability. Trend conditions have deteriorated, without yet reaching an extreme downside state.

Updated 2026-05-17 · RUSSELL1000
ENTRY TODAY
Neutral price zoneabove norm
TODAY (5y history)52nd pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a broadly neutral part of its long-term range, while its multiple is above its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Growth 0
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Profitability 1
Bottom 25% of peers
Moderate Stability 15
Bottom 25% of peers
Strongest Valuation 88
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
30
Peer-Score
Below-average peer position
Signal qualitylow

Explore how OC compares across its peer group

Break down OC's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare OC with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.