Norsk Hydro ASA ranks below the peer group median, with strong stability offset by weak growth. Recent price action is broadly in line with the structural positioning.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Norsk Hydro ASA is a global aluminum producer with operations spanning bauxite mining, energy, and the manufacture of primary and recycled aluminum products.
A low quality score of 36/100 and sharply negative revenue growth (-14.2% YoY) keep pressure on Norsk Hydro’s valuation, even as the stock trades at a forward P/E of 13.2x—well below the peer median. The dominant tension is earnings weakness: the company’s operational profile has not convinced the market that a rerating is warranted, despite the apparent discount.
Net income for the last fiscal year was positive at €6.7bn, and the operating margin of 13.1% is stable, but neither metric stands out versus sector leaders. The stability score of 46/100 is mid-range, suggesting that while core profitability is not under immediate threat, it is not enough to offset the persistent growth and quality shortfalls. The forward P/E significantly below peers appears solid, but does not translate into a compelling case for revaluation while growth remains weak and quality unimproved.
External context complicates the picture rather than clarifying it. Divergent analyst ratings in early 2026 underscore market uncertainty about Norsk Hydro’s near-term trajectory. The company’s strategic expansion into recycled aluminum and green investments has not yet materially impacted the company’s core financial metrics, leaving the discount in place for now.
Compared to peers, Norsk Hydro’s quality and growth scores are at the weaker end of the group—Sherwin-Williams and CRH both post stronger quality (67 and 48) and growth (36 and 58) scores. The valuation discount is more severe than many peers due to persistent underperformance in both quality and growth. This pattern is partly driven by factors specific to Norsk Hydro, including its recent revenue declines and the slow translation of sustainability initiatives into financial results.
A more constructive read would require revenue growth returning to positive territory versus peers and a material improvement in quality score above 50. Supporting improvement would include evidence that sustainability initiatives are lifting margins or growth. Until then, Norsk Hydro appears as a value name trading at a discount for understandable reasons, with quality not yet fully rewarded.
Break down NHY.OL's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.