Nordic Semiconductor ASA ranks among the weaker positions in its peer group, with profitability as the least supportive dimension. The trend setup is mixed, though short-term momentum remains constructive. Current market behavior is broadly confirming the weaker structural profile.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Nordic Semiconductor ASA designs and manufactures wireless communication semiconductor products, specializing in connectivity solutions for short-range applications.
NOD trades as a cyclical growth name with a valuation premium. With revenue growth at 24% year-on-year, the company shows strong momentum, but the market focuses more on the pace of growth than on fundamentals. Because NOD’s revenue is concentrated in short-range products, any slowdown or acceleration in demand is immediately reflected in the share price, as the market reacts swiftly to perceived changes in the growth trajectory—evidenced by the 54% one-year volatility. While diversification into long-range and cloud is ongoing, the market continues to price NOD primarily on its cyclical growth trajectory rather than rewarding stable margins. A single weak growth quarter triggers abrupt rerating.
Break down NOD.OL's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.