Newmont Corporation ranks in the top quartile of its peer group, with stability as the least supportive dimension. Price action is not yet fully confirming the underlying structural profile.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Newmont Corporation is a gold mining company focused on gold production and exploration activities worldwide.
NEM is priced as a gold sector anchor, not just a price lever. The market grants Newmont a premium because its 32.7% operating margin signals efficiency and production security. However, its 41.8% one-year volatility—high for a mega-cap—shows that the market is quick to reprice the premium at any sign of instability, amplifying both positive and negative surprises. NEM’s combination of scale, portfolio optimization, and reserve focus differentiates it from other gold miners, supporting its reputation as a reliable exposure to the sector. This positioning results in a valuation premium for stability and sector leadership. A production miss or guidance cut would likely compress the premium abruptly.
Break down NEM's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.