MasTec, Inc. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with strong growth offset by weak stability. Trend conditions have deteriorated, without yet reaching an extreme downside state.
Discounted for Margin Instability, Not Missed Value
52w drawdown -37.7% · 21d vs sector -31.2%
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
MasTec, Inc. provides infrastructure construction services across sectors such as power delivery and data centers.
The market prices MasTec as a turnaround bet at a discount, not as a reliable quality name in infrastructure. With an operating margin of just 2.1%—over 300 basis points below the peer median—and a ROIC of 3.5% that fails to clear the cost of capital, MasTec’s expansion is seen as risk-laden rather than value-creating. In infrastructure and construction services, stable margins and capital returns are the foundation of quality, and because MasTec continues to post margin pressure and volatile returns, the market imposes a consistently steeper discount versus peers, directly penalizing any sign of underperformance on these quality anchors. The discount will not lift until MasTec delivers peer-level margins and ROIC for at least two quarters; until then, the market’s caution is the price of entry.
Break down MTZ's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.