lululemon athletica inc. ranks near the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong profitability and valuation, but weak growth and stability. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price action is lagging the structural profile — current market behavior is not yet confirming the structural position.
Quality Business, Discounted by Market Nerves
52w drawdown -64.5% · 21d vs sector -13.0%
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Lululemon Athletica designs and sells premium athletic apparel and accessories, operating a global supply chain and retail network.
Lululemon delivers quality, but the market prices the stock as if uncertainty dominates every move. The company posts a 33.2% ROIC—well above industry averages and evidence of strong capital returns—yet its one-year volatility of 48.2% signals a persistent lack of investor confidence. Rather than reflecting stable fundamentals, the market reacts to every growth update or guidance change with outsized swings. As a premium athletic apparel brand with a global supply chain, Lululemon's valuation hinges on sustaining margins despite external shocks. Strong company, but the market does not believe in calm.
Break down LULU's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.