Johnson Matthey Plc ranks near the peer group median, with valuation as the main structural strength, while profitability is less supportive than the other dimensions. The market setup is mixed, without a clear directional signal.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Johnson Matthey Plc develops technologies focused on emissions control and precious metal products.
JMAT is traded as an emissions-driven specialist, not a peer basket. The market prices in regulatory upside and treats every policy shift as a direct revenue lever, which means even small regulatory changes can drive sharp price swings—evident in the 46.2% one-year volatility, far above the sector median. JMAT stands out by focusing on emissions control and hydrogen technologies, and the market applies a discount to its 14.07% revenue growth (FY26, outpacing the sector median) by consistently marking down the stock rather than rewarding it with a premium, showing that investors demand visible proof of sustained momentum before re-rating. A regulatory setback or a missed growth quarter triggers a sharp rerating.
Break down JMAT.L's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.