Interpump Group S.p.A. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong valuation, but weak growth and stability. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure.
Interpump: Discounted for Cyclical Weakness
52w drawdown -33.9% · 21d vs sector -13.6%
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Interpump Group S.p.A. manufactures high-pressure pumps and hydraulic components for industrial and commercial applications.
The market prices Interpump Group as a cyclically challenged name whose margin and efficiency trends no longer keep pace with leading peers. With EBITDA margin at 21.9%—down 2.3 percentage points year-on-year—and revenue growth of just 0.6%, the company’s recent performance shows declining operational strength, leading investors to discount the stock relative to the sector. In the capital goods sector, margin stability and capital returns are essential valuation anchors; the market now penalizes Interpump for underperforming peers on these metrics. The market applies no premium multiple and keeps the stock below peer levels. Only a clear turnaround in both margins and growth to peer levels would change the market’s pricing logic.
Break down IP.MI's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.