Interpump Group S.p.A. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with strong valuation offset by weak stability. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Recent price action is broadly in line with the structural positioning.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Interpump Group S.p.A. manufactures high-pressure pumps and hydraulic components for industrial applications.
The market prices Interpump Group on deteriorating peer-relative quality and margin risk, not on sustainable capital returns. With EBITDA margin guidance at 22.0% for FY26, below the peer median, and revenue growth at just 0.6% in Q1 2026, Interpump’s current cycle performance lags sector leaders. Because the company underperforms in both margin stability and growth, the market actively penalizes the stock for its cyclical characteristics, rather than rewarding it as a quality anchor—resulting in only mixed valuation support. In industrial machinery, margin stability and growth are core quality signals, and Interpump is losing ground to names like Spirax and Bucher. Only a return to above-average growth and margins in line with peers would break the current valuation framing.
Break down IP.MI's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.