Home Companies IP.MI
Industrials · Specialty Industrial Machinery · Peer Analysis

Interpump Group S.p.A. (IP.MI) — Structural Peer Analysis

Interpump Group S.p.A. ranks below the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong valuation, but weak growth and profitability. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Recent price action is broadly in line with the structural positioning.

Updated 2026-04-05 · STOXX600
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Growth 18
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Stability 22
Bottom 25% of peers
Moderate Profitability 29
Below median
Strongest Valuation 75
Top 25% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
39
Peer-Score
Below-average peer position
Signal qualityHigh

Explore how IP.MI compares across its peer group

Break down IP.MI's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare IP.MI with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.